--- /dev/null
+From 47345f5dcfb91da8afed7c4e6c29faa2056db447 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: MXE
+Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:44:24 +1000
+Subject: [PATCH] remove gets since c++11 removed it
+ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-03/msg00186.html
+
+
+diff --git a/srclib/stdio.in.h b/srclib/stdio.in.h
+index 473c84c..dfb59eb 100644
+--- a/srclib/stdio.in.h
++++ b/srclib/stdio.in.h
+@@ -679,22 +679,11 @@ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (getline, "getline is unportable - "
+ # endif
+ #endif
+
+-#if @GNULIB_GETS@
+-# if @REPLACE_STDIO_READ_FUNCS@ && @GNULIB_STDIO_H_NONBLOCKING@
+-# if !(defined __cplusplus && defined GNULIB_NAMESPACE)
+-# undef gets
+-# define gets rpl_gets
+-# endif
+-_GL_FUNCDECL_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s) _GL_ARG_NONNULL ((1)));
+-_GL_CXXALIAS_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s));
+-# else
+-_GL_CXXALIAS_SYS (gets, char *, (char *s));
+-# undef gets
+-# endif
+-_GL_CXXALIASWARN (gets);
+ /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin,
+- so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is
+- always declared, since it is required by C89. */
++ so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning; besides, C11
++ removed it. */
++#undef gets
++#if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS
+ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
+ #endif
+
+--
+1.8.2.3
$(D)/libiconv: $(ARCHIVE)/libiconv-1.14.tar.gz | $(TARGETPREFIX)
$(UNTAR)/libiconv-1.14.tar.gz
pushd $(BUILD_TMP)/libiconv-1.14 && \
+ $(PATCH)/libiconv-1-fixes.patch && \
$(CONFIGURE) --build=$(BUILD) --host=$(TARGET) --target=$(TARGET) --prefix= --datarootdir=/.remove && \
$(MAKE) && \
$(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(TARGETPREFIX)